<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CNET is best acquirer of Digg</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.stevepoland.com/cnet-is-best-acquirer-of-digg/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.stevepoland.com/cnet-is-best-acquirer-of-digg/</link>
	<description>web entrepreneur &#124; obsessed music fan &#124; b-lo forever!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 14:32:45 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: KwangErn</title>
		<link>http://blog.stevepoland.com/cnet-is-best-acquirer-of-digg/comment-page-1/#comment-1250</link>
		<dc:creator>KwangErn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 11:54:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stevepoland.com/cnet-is-best-acquirer-of-digg/#comment-1250</guid>
		<description>Internet is all about neutrality and worldwide collaborative interaction. Digg provides that. When any giants acquire Digg, we have a big problem in terms of neutrality, though one may say that Digg itself isn&#039;t neutral in some ways. But at least it&#039;s more neutral than say, having Microsoft/CNET churning out whatever they want.

This is where Reddit wins out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Internet is all about neutrality and worldwide collaborative interaction. Digg provides that. When any giants acquire Digg, we have a big problem in terms of neutrality, though one may say that Digg itself isn&#8217;t neutral in some ways. But at least it&#8217;s more neutral than say, having Microsoft/CNET churning out whatever they want.</p>
<p>This is where Reddit wins out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Wales</title>
		<link>http://blog.stevepoland.com/cnet-is-best-acquirer-of-digg/comment-page-1/#comment-1249</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Wales</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 17:14:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stevepoland.com/cnet-is-best-acquirer-of-digg/#comment-1249</guid>
		<description>I think CNET is a great option to acquire digg - but I don&#039;t see them making any drastic changes or &quot;integrating&quot; it into their family of sites at all. I really don&#039;t see anyone doing this - if/when digg is sold, they&#039;ll keep the design the same, Kevin Rose will stay on board, and diggnation will continue to be recorded.

The question is: does CNET have the money?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think CNET is a great option to acquire digg &#8211; but I don&#8217;t see them making any drastic changes or &#8220;integrating&#8221; it into their family of sites at all. I really don&#8217;t see anyone doing this &#8211; if/when digg is sold, they&#8217;ll keep the design the same, Kevin Rose will stay on board, and diggnation will continue to be recorded.</p>
<p>The question is: does CNET have the money?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
