<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: IDEA #72 &#8211; Digg for Facebook Photos</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.stevepoland.com/idea-72-digg-for-facebook-photos/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.stevepoland.com/idea-72-digg-for-facebook-photos/</link>
	<description>web entrepreneur &#124; obsessed music fan &#124; b-lo forever!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 14:32:45 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Wayne Mulligan</title>
		<link>http://blog.stevepoland.com/idea-72-digg-for-facebook-photos/comment-page-1/#comment-1107</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayne Mulligan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 17:53:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stevepoland.com/?p=282#comment-1107</guid>
		<description>Steve,

This would actually be a perfect fit for Hong over at HotorNot - they already do something similar with their Facebook app - all they&#039;d need to do at that point is allow people to choose which photos they want rated.  I don&#039;t think they can put widgets directly into the FB photos app (just in case people aren&#039;t aware, the current photo software on Facebook is just like a regular platform app, it can be removed and replaced with something else).

Good idea.

-Wayne</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve,</p>
<p>This would actually be a perfect fit for Hong over at HotorNot &#8211; they already do something similar with their Facebook app &#8211; all they&#8217;d need to do at that point is allow people to choose which photos they want rated.  I don&#8217;t think they can put widgets directly into the FB photos app (just in case people aren&#8217;t aware, the current photo software on Facebook is just like a regular platform app, it can be removed and replaced with something else).</p>
<p>Good idea.</p>
<p>-Wayne</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Inventoids Steve</title>
		<link>http://blog.stevepoland.com/idea-72-digg-for-facebook-photos/comment-page-1/#comment-1108</link>
		<dc:creator>Inventoids Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 11:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stevepoland.com/?p=282#comment-1108</guid>
		<description>This is a nice idea, and one that an fb app should be able to take forward, rather than rely on core facebook function - I would have thought.
Easily extended into an istockphoto killer too to generate some revenue.
Hopefully it won&#039;t take off too well though, I have no doubt that my photos would either be ignored or voted down as &#039;stupid&#039; or &#039;ugly&#039;. Either way, my ego doesn&#039;t need that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a nice idea, and one that an fb app should be able to take forward, rather than rely on core facebook function &#8211; I would have thought.<br />
Easily extended into an istockphoto killer too to generate some revenue.<br />
Hopefully it won&#8217;t take off too well though, I have no doubt that my photos would either be ignored or voted down as &#8217;stupid&#8217; or &#8216;ugly&#8217;. Either way, my ego doesn&#8217;t need that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
